Monday, December 31, 2007

There Will Be Blood

http://images.rottentomatoes.com/images/movie/gallery/1183553/photo_02.jpg

***1/2 Stars

There Will Be Blood is soaked with the obscurity of Daniel Day Lewis's character, which is sort of the point. Beneath the surface, this character is so desperate and greedy for oil that he will give up anything to succeed in the industry, even his adopted son.

So what's the film trying to tell us? Well I guess that nothing has changed since the turn of the nineteenth century and we are still dependent on oil. You would think an alternate fuel would be invented even before a thought of landing on the moon, but I guess no matter what technology we build, some things don't change. For another example, we have the scientific ability to transform a human heart, but no set-and-stone cure for the common cold.

Daniel Day-Lewis's performance is a revelation, one of the best you'll see all year. He may only make a handful of movies a decade but he is still one of the most mesmerizing actors in the film industry (check out him as Bill the Butcher in Scorsese's Gangs of New York and try to sleep that one off). He plays Daniel Plainview, a silver digger turned oil tycoon in just under a decade. The film begins with basically no dialogue for twenty minutes. It is scary in its own haunting way, watching Plainview dig for silver in the New Mexico wilderness. He breaks his leg but finds an ocean of oil under him in the process. He hires a crew and takes them to the site to dig it up. One man who dies had an infant son who is adopted by Plainview. Nine years later, Plainview becomes moderately successful in the industry and he and his adopted son H.W travel to a ranch to find another ocean of money with the information coming from
a young man named Paul Sunday(a powerful Paul Dano). Plainview checks out the area and agrees to dig there. Paul's twin brother Eli tells him that a $10,000 donation to Eli's church must be granted if he digs here. Plainview agrees.

Now the film wants you to believe that Paul and Eli are different people, but we never see them together and both are literally 100% identical in both appearance and the tone of their voices. So I conclude that they (I mean he) is up to something.

Plainview is an excellent speaker and he doesn't even know it. His speech to the Sunday Ranch is very convincing, giving false hope to the residents that this oil will bring them all fortune. In the first steps of his plan, things begin to go smoothly, but director Paul Thomas Anderson knows that the story needs to end in tragedy. Plainview begins to question everyone he meets and will go to the lengths of killing men to sustain his thirst for sovereignty.

In order to understand Daniel Plainview's motives, it is important to realize that he hates all men, hates everything about them, and will do anything to make sure only he succeeds and everyone else fails. With this philosophy, it is hard to believe that you don't hate yourself in the process, which Plainview will understand later on in the film.

I've seen this film twice now and I'm still having a hard time with the foundation of the plot. It is loosely based on Upton Sinclair's 1927 novel Oil!, but in a Paul Thomas Anderson film it is always hard to determine what is actually occurring on screen. For me, There Will Be Blood is some sort of apocalyptic theory that foreshadows the worlds downfall with its obsession of greed, even though this takes place almost one-hundred years prior to present day. I guess the only problem I have with There Will Be Blood is that Plainview is a hard man to care about because he has nothing to lose. He has no loved-ones, no friends, and no regrets about his past. So when his tragic downfall occurs, I had a hard time feeling for his character. If you can ignore that, you will see that this is Daniel Day-Lewis's show, managing to capture the poignant evil of this man as he slowly meets his demise. The film runs long (almost three hours) but it is important that it feels long because it takes infinite moments for a story like this to settle in an ocean of greed, in this case one that lasts a lifetime.

Sunday, December 30, 2007

Atonement

**** Stars

When it comes to critiquing films, I usually post a review the same day or night I see the movie just to make sure certain plot points and dialogue are still fresh in my mind. But after seeing Joe Wright's adaptation of the Ian McEwan novel, I felt uncertain about how I felt towards Atonement. It left me sad, distraught, and confused. It made me question the very existence of love. So I tested my patience. Day after day, its presence is frequently gandering inside my mind and I can't shake it off. Atonement is the antonym of Disney's Enchanted where not every story ends happily ever after. This is a tragedy on the highest accord.

Unfortunately, I was actually in the middle of the book when I saw the film version. I wanted to finish the book first, but I didn't want to risk missing it before it left the theaters. This seems to be one of the most talked about films of the season. It now has been nominated for seven Oscars, even with Wright being snubbed for best director. James McAvoy and Keira Knightley
are both wonderfully cast as Robbie Turner and Cecilia Tallis, two young adults who forge a secret passion towards eachother, in which suffer dire consequences.

The film begins in 1935 England, with Cecilia and her family lounging around their enormous mansion that is so clean and elegant, that it is sometimes painful to see. Cecilia's thirteen year-old sister Briony Tallis (Saoirse Ronan, who deserves her Oscar nomination) who like any other thirteen year-old, wants the attention completely on her. Her room is as clean as a room can get, with her toys lined up, her bed perfectly made, and a feeling that if a toy fell out of place, she would weep in self-dissapointment. I would personally go mad in a house like this.

So when you're young, rich, and have nothing to do all day, it would seem pretty easy for you're imagination to become reality, right? Briony, who has a secret crush on Robbie, begins to notice a spark between him and Cecilia. Before dinner, Robbie wants to write Cecilia a letter to express his feelings. As he goes through several copies, he writes one for a self pleasure (what he really wants to do to her). When writing the novel, McEwan needed something to stand out. What word would totally confuse and scare a thirteen year old? Well, Robbie's letter is sexual, with the word "c**t" bulging off the page. He accidentally delivers that letter to Cecilia, with Briony as the messenger.

Briony opens the letter and sees this word. She doesn't really understand it, but she thinks she does. Later that evening, she hands the letter to Cecilia. While Cecilia is offended, she can't help but resist a love that has been dwindling in her mind. Her and Robbie sneak off to a room in the house and passionately make love, until Briony walks in.

Now after seeing this letter and witnessing this event, Briony wants Robbie out of Cecilia's life. So when their cousin is raped that night by a house-guest, it is Briony's chance to make sure Cecilia doesn't get with him. She falsely-accuses Robbie as the rapist. Robbie is sent to jail, then the army. Before he leaves, the two declare their love for eachother (Cecilia knows he didn't do it, she and Robbie know that Briony lied). For the rest of her life, Briony is forced to live with this event gorged in the very front of her mind. Her act of atonement forces the three to live their life in tragedy.

Joe Wright's direction here is simply superb. In a five minute and thirty second tracking shot, Wright captures the horror of World War II, when Robbie walks through a battlefield of limbs, death, and destruction. The shot is in the caliber of Orson Welles, with such shots as the famous opening in Touch of Evil.

Atonement is an epic love story with the same level of tragedy as Titanic. Two people, meant for eachother, are forced to live out their love in ways no one should. But the power of love is so esoteric and essential to a humans heart, in this case a heart stripped of its right to warm another.



Saturday, December 29, 2007

Into The Wild

**** Stars

There are trips to the movies, and then there are movie experiences. Into the Wild's journey is so moving and philosophical that it made me feel in places I didn't know existed. The story of Christopher McCandless is the shadow of a life that I would have if I told the establishment to go to hell. I have had this strong sense of rebellion this year towards the status-quo and McCandless lived out a very deep and distant fantasy of mine.

Emile Hirsch gives the best performance of his young career as the promising twenty-two year old college graduate who gave all his money to charity and literally went into the wild in search of something adventurous. His journey transformed him into an iconic figure for the people he met, bordering an image of a spiritual being. Catherine Keener, Vince Vaughn, and Hal Holbrook are part of the great supporting cast who look at the magic Hirsch's character has brought in their lives. Hal Holbrook as Ron Franz especially, brings such beautiful emotion to the scenes he shares with Hirsch, especially when Chris convinces Ron to prove to himself he can climb a steep hill. The scene brought a hopeful smile I couldn't shake off until the heartbreaking finale, where Chris's journey ends on a tragic note.

Chris
McCandless's life ended August 18th, 1992 after accidentally eating a Hedysarum alpinum toxic plant which makes a person unable to swallow therefore causing him to starve. After his death there were Moose hunters who found a devastating note left by Chris in the wilderness of Alaska.

"S.O.S I need your help. I am injured, near death, and too weak to hike out of here. I am all alone, this is no joke. In the name of God, please remain to save me. I am out collecting berries close by and shall return this evening. Thank you, Chris McCandless. August?"

The message of the film brings into question the very reason why humans exist. Is today's society crippling the freedom past generations have so aptly endured? Does any young man have the will power to leave behind a promising life and live out a journey of absolute freedom? Into The Wild, directed with such beauty by Sean Penn brings us an experience you may not understand, but certainly one you won't forget.

Friday, December 28, 2007

Juno

**** Stars

Juno is a reason why they invented movies. The second its over, you feel like hugging yourself and everyone around you, and then watching the film again. I fell in love with this film and Ellen Page in the very first scene.

Ellen Page not only plays Juno Macguff, she is Juno Macguff, the lovely sixteen year old girl whose future is about to change drastically when she discovers that she is knocked up (And don't worry, this is not Judd Apatow's Knocked Up, this is something different and a bit more magical.) She discovers that the father is her best friend Paulie Bleeker (a perfectly cast Michael Cera
, from Superbad and Arrested Development fame) who runs with his track team every day and eat more tic-tacs then any human should. Both seem to be secretly in love with eachother, they just don't know what to do with it yet.

When Juno tells her father and stepmother (
J.K Simmons and Allison Janney) about her pregnancy, they take it in a more refreshing way then the status-quo would have you believe. Of course they're surprised and disappointed, but instead of throwing Juno in her room until the end of her days, they discuss it with her and realize that she needs them to be there or else she won't get through this. Even though I have never been in any situation like Juno and Paulie, I can relate to them so much that it made me shake. They both have to live with the problems teenagers can potentially face during their high school years. Should Paulie's family find out about this even though Juno is going to be putting the child up for adoption? Can something this devastating shed some good in the world? Well Juno thinks so. She wants to give her child to a couple in desperate hope for a baby.

Jennifer Gardner is wonderful as Vanessa, a born-to-be mother ready to take on the beauty of Juno's child. Her husband Mark (Jason Bateman) is a composer who shares many interests with Juno. The film could have taken a turn for the worse involving the characters of Juno and Mark (I think you know what I mean by that), but instead the screenwriter Diablo Cody brings us to a point in the story we didn't see coming: everything we basically expected, but in a beautiful and poetic way. The last frame of this film will have you crying with happiness.

I want to talk more about Diablo Cody. This is her first screenplay, and she wrote it while getting naked for men in a Minneapolis strip club. Her real name is Brook Busey, but she ditched the name and kind of told the establishment to go to hell. Now, she has serious Oscar buzz for Juno's screenplay and already has Steven Spielberg calling her for work. Because of this writer's strike, Cody is getting the best deals of her life with basically no competition.

Director Jason Reitman seems to know exactly how to handle material like this. It seems that the Thank You For Smoking director is not a one hit wonder. Even though Juno is fourth on my top ten list, it is one of my favorite films of the decade. I have a strong feeling that it will grow on me more and more each day I think about it. It reminds me to continue towards my dream the way Diablo Cody did and never give in to something I don't believe in. Juno is destined to become an iconic teenage movie character. I am three years older than her and I look up to her more than most adults. I hope this film makes the careers of Ellen Page and Michael Cera, who should realize that 2007 is their year to shine.

Thursday, December 27, 2007

National Treasure: Book of Secrets

*** Stars

When National Treasure came out in 2004, I found it as a guilty pleasure. I still put on the DVD when I need a film that is easy to watch. This year, the sequel National Treasure: Book of Secrets is basically the same movie as the first, with a few different plot twists. Both are very easy to watch and to realize that the cast is having so much fun.

First, let's clear up why Helen Mirren is in this movie. In many interviews this year, Mirren explains that this has been a dream come true. In the Orlando Sentinel, Mirren's interview explains why she chose a Jerry Bruckheimer production:

“My ambition, in film, has always been to fly on wires. In this film, I got to do that. Finally! I was so excited when I was told that would be a part of the movie, me in a harness. I did this movie for the fun, the fun of flying across a canyon, or standing in this huge pyramid chamber while the greatest technicians in the world filled it with water all around you. For two weeks! That’s fun!”

It would seem that she did this film for the money. Well, so what if Mirren did get a hefty paycheck? If I won an Oscar, I don't think my next project would be an independent film for no money, unless it had the caliber of the next Mean Streets.

Let's get back to the film. Book of Secrets can be draggy at some points and the plot is again preposterous, but it's so nice to see a film bring actual historical events into something that could rely more on violence. Nicholas Cage reprises his role as Benjamin Gates, the treasure hunter who has already found the greatest treasure in the world (in the 2004 box-office hit). In the sequel, he wants to clear his family name when Thomas Gates, Ben's great-grandfather, is mentioned in one of the missing pages of John Wilkes Booth's diary. This could prove that he was behind the conspiracy of the Lincoln assassination. With the help of the gang from the first film, his buddy Riley (Justin Bartha), his now ex-girlfriend Abigail (Diane Krueger), his father Patrick Gates (Jon Voight), and new to the cast his mother Emily (Dame Helen Mirren), they set out on an adventure to prove that the Gate family is innocent and to find another treasure, one that could be the greatest in the world.

The cast has so much fun here and you want to be apart of it. I came out of the first film wondering if Cage, Voight, and Harvey Keitel (who is only in a couple scenes in the sequel) were just taking hefty paychecks. But as an actor, it has to be refreshing to have the freedom to bring whatever you want to your role and realize that being apart of something fun can be just as rewarding as something earned. It seemed Mirren was just as excited about this than her Oscar win last year.

Director John Turtletaub and Producer Jerry Bruckheimer have collaborated with their special effects team to create some wonderful sets and very smooth cinematography. The film is better than it will be given credit for. This is Indiana Jones on a junior level, which can have something for everyone. To enjoy the film, sit back and go along for the ride. Otherwise, you will be left behind on a trip that is actually worth taking.

Walk Hard: The Dewey Cox Story


*** Stars

A spoof on Walk the Line from the guys who brought you Knocked Up, The 40-Year Old Virgin, Talladega Nights, and Superbad? These are some of the best comedies this decade, so does Walk Hard join them? Well not quite, but it's still worth a look.

Dewey Cox is played by John C. Reilly, who has been in so many supporting roles in the past few years that he finally gets a showcase role to prove that he can be totally hilarious. To understand the jokes, you're going to have to see the Johnny Cash biopic Walk the Line, otherwise you may be scratching your head at some of the humor, including a bit about chopping his brother in half with a machete. After that very brutal but very silly death of his brother, Cox wants to honor his brother by becoming a musician. When his song Walk Hard hits #1, Cox becomes famous and drugs and screwing women become the status-quo of his life. He ends up having 22 kids and 14 stepkids (some are of other races including one named Dewey-Raheem) and takes every drug a man could possibly take. Throughout his struggles, his heart is set on his backup singer Darlene, who he tries to woo for the entire movie. During his PCP tripping days, Cox travels with the Beatles to take drugs with them. The Beatles spoof has Paul Rudd as John Lennon, Jack Black as Paul McCartney, Justin Long as George Harrison, and Jason Schwartzman as Ringo Starr. This is one of the funniest scenes of the year and it is almost worth the price of admission.


John C. Reilly finally gets a roll he can dive into and does deserve the Golden Globe nomination he received this year. It is such a tough genre to pull off and Walk Hard manages to hit the high notes of other successful spoofs like Mel Brook's Spaceballs and manages to rise way above the garbage of the Epic and Date Movie films. At 100 minutes, there are many jokes that are hit-and-miss and some of the songs are a bit of a drag, but there is still plenty here to enjoy if you like these kind of movies. If they're done right, I'm one of them.


Wednesday, December 26, 2007

Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street

**** Stars

Sweeney Todd is here...

Johnny Depp and Tim Burton collaborate for their sixth motion picture together. The film had to overcome some bad buzz and whether or not Depp's appearance looked a bit too familiar (looks like Edward Scissorhands and sounds like Jack Sparrow). Well Sweeney Todd proves that buzz can mean nothing and that it does resemble Depp's prior roles. But who wouldn't want to see the two performances combined together in a bloody musical adapted from a famous Broadway show? I was totally pulled in.

Depp plays Todd, which is an alias to his prior self Benjamin Barker. Barker was falsely convicted of raping his wife Lucy, by the Judge Turpin (the always impressive Alan Rickman) and deported him to Australia (Turpin was in love with his wife who eventually poisoned herself.) After the death of Lucy, Turpin takes custody of his infant daughter Johanna. This sets up Barker's transition to Sweeney Todd, as he illegally returns to Victorian England years later (with the help of a young man named Anthony) to have his revenge. With the help of Mrs. Lovett (Helena Bonham Carter) the worst meatpie cook in London, Todd sets up a barber chair to slit the throats of all his customers. It's the perfect date movie.

Alright, I'm Kidding. But don't let that stop you. This is one bloody excellent thriller with dazzling visuals and wonderful songs. The Tony-award winning production went onto Broadway in 1979 with music and lyrics by Stephen Sondheim and while Depp may not have a Broadway voice, his tone and passion create a style of singing that is perfect for a film. This is a dark production and it takes someone with enough confidence like Depp (who was actually cast as Todd before even singing one note from the script) to create a character we truly care for while he is slaughtering people by the throat left and right. For myself, Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street joins a rare category this year with other films including Once and Across the Universe: musicals that are one of the best films of the year.

Saturday, December 22, 2007

Charlie Wilson's War

***1/2 Stars

I think Charlie Wilson's War suffered from what people were calling the Dreamgirl effect, where the buzz was so strong, that anything short of stellar would be a major letdown. Maybe that happened with Dreamgirls, but not with Charlie Wilson's War, which lives up to its massive hype.

Tom Hanks is and probably always will be the actor that has inspired me the most. I grew up on all his films. I basically know every line to Forrest Gump and Apollo 13, Toy Story is my favorite animated film, and I consider him the James Stewart of our generation. So in Charlie Wilson's War, I knew Tom Hanks would impress me and I'm glad to see him give his best performance since Cast Away.

Charlie Wilson was a single and boozing womanizer who would rather have a glass of whiskey at ten in the morning and flirt with his assistants than work on his reputation as a Congressman from Texas. This story is based off the 2003 book Charlie Wilson's War by George Crile III, which was adapted to the screen by the dialogue king Aaron Sorkin (created The West Wing and the very underrated Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip).
The film begins with him drinking whiskey and flirting with strippers in a Vegas penthouse jacuzzi. This is the set up to the man who was the biggest influence in ending the Cold War. Some of our greatest leaders have fit this description. FDR stopped prohibition and would rarely go a day without a martini and Kennedy was in numerous scandals involving sexual relations with women (Elvis may have killed him over Ann Margaret is still a conspiracy. OK, I'm joking). What's interesting about Wilson is the way his flaws actually gave some positive impact towards his decisions.

Julia Roberts plays Joanne Herring, voted the sixth most beautiful woman in Texas. Wilson's weakness towards women let Joanne convince him to take down the Soviet Empire. Charlie and Joanne bumped uglies and then he began his plan to raise the budget (that aided Afghanistan's fight over the Soviets) from $5 million to a hell of a lot more. Over time, Wilson managed to raise over one billion dollars. He claimed that if the U.S shot down the helicopters then they would win the war. In a way, he made the perfect decision.

The film is proof that women have a certain power of men. Charlie Wilson had a kind heart but would jump at the chance to get with a woman. Joanne took her power of stunning beauty and used it to convince this man to take down one of the biggest empires in the world. With the help of
a bored CIA specialist named Gust Avrakotos (the always amazing Philip Seymour Hoffman), the two travel from country to country trying to bring allies together. When the Soviet Union and the Berlin Wall fell, Wilson went to congress to ask for a mere $1 million dollars to rebuild a school in Afghanistan. They rejected the reconstruction of the city and Wilson claims that we had the right objective in mind, but "we fucked up the end game."

This is another successful film involving the important issues of today. Even though this took place in the Reagan years, it still brings questions to the table involving foreign issues and the mistakes of political decisions. What makes this such an entertaining film is how blisteringly funny it is. When Wilson is leaving a limo with two strippers inside it, they ask why he was to leave. He claimed that he had to vote for something involving the Boy Scouts of America. The stripper responds with a snappy "Are you fucking kidding me?" Line for line, Sorkin never misses a beat, even though some moments are a bit silly (there are moments when things are a bit too staged as when Wilson's assistants are helping him cover a scandal he was involved in). But who cares? The scene is so fun and so confident that it works. Plus, Amy Adams plays his personal assistant who I am growing to love more and more in each film I see her in (if you haven't seen her Oscar nominated role in Junebug, you are missing out). This is a refreshing and lighter look at important issues and history that feels like a politically charged Thank You for Smoking. Directed by Hollywood legend Mike Nichols (The Graduate, Closer), Charlie Wilson's War is carried with the wit and snappy comedy to allow anyone to walk away satisfied. Hanks and Hoffman are a duo of jocular strength, capturing the other side of what the media brings us.
Who said history has to always be taken seriously?

Saturday, December 15, 2007

I Am Legend

**1/2 Stars

If God had to choose one person to be immune to a virus that eliminates life on earth, I'm sure God would pick Will Smith. Smith has the power to demand I Am Legend's authenticity towards its subject, but even he can't save an ending that is one of the worst an audience member could ask for after such a promising start.

Smith plays Robert Neville, a brilliant scientist who claims to be the last man on earth after a deadly virus has wiped out civilization. Many have died and others have been transformed into mutants, which like in any other zombie flick, have the power of a superhero juiced up on steroids. Neville and his dog Sam spend the days hunting, gathering, and trying to find a cure to the disease while locking themselves in at night to avoid being a mutants dinner. Director Frank Lawrence (Constantine) has the patience to create a great build-up and to let Smith do what he does best, be the hero of heroes. But the film gets to a point when you look at the person next to you and say "This can either get really good or painfully bad." I'm sad to report that you will be in pain.

A cliched third-act not only ruins this film, it destroys it. I made a vow to never give away spoilers that give away something to my readers, but I will say that you will know exactly where this film is going the second you feel the film takes a turn for a worse. The entire audience in the theater I was in realized this moment roughly at the same time. After being teased for the first hour, I Am Legend is Constantine and War of the Worlds in a blender, mixed with the schlock that is unnecessary to the film and unfair to Mr. Smith.

Thursday, December 13, 2007

The Golden Compass

** Stars

In a nutshell, The Golden Compass is a major disappointment, filled with bloated action cliches and underwritten characters. Do not be fooled by the trailers, Nicole Kidman's and Daniel Craig's talent are wasted. Both are reduced to the most limited screen time I have ever seen leads get.

Rather than letting us escape into the world of these characters, director Chris Weitz reduces it to a lecture of how the audience should think. In the very beginning, Eva Green plays a witch whose character tells us that there is another world where people's souls are actually demons (shaped like animals who are always by there side). We're not shown, we're told. In the Lord of the Rings trilogy, we're given a background of the ring's history and what it had gone through. We're not given a back story but rather an idea that there are other worlds that have very different life styles.

A young girl named Lyra Belacqua (Dakota Blue Richards) is caught between two worlds when she is found discussing something she shouldn't know. She learns of the term dust and how it could be a portal to another world. But there are certain people who do not want this to happen. Nicole Kidman plays Marisa Coulter, a woman apart who tricks the child into believing that she will take her on an adventure. Lyra soon discovers that she is up to something much worse.

I have to ad that it is almost impossible to ad Daniel Craig to the plot summary of this film. He is in it for almost ten minutes. He plays Lyra's uncle who journeys to find the link between the universes. The problem is that they don't show his adventure, only the idea of it. Hell, even Kidman is wasted and is waiting around for the plot to come back to her character.

There are some scenes filled with exciting moments. Kidman owns every seen she is in, bringing the ruthlessness to a very dark villain. Her seduction to the child is interesting. What child wouldn't want to go on an adventure with a beautiful smooth-talking Nicole Kidman? There is also a climatic fight between two polar bears that is visually stunning.

The film is based of the novel by Philip Pullman, whose controversial subject has drawn several Christian groups claiming that the book encourages children to practice atheism. I haven't read the novel, but the film adaptation does bring an idea that there is an evil religious empire brainwashing children to believe in their ideas. The problem with The Golden Compass is that the ideas are uncertain and the empire is left somewhat clueless, therefore we are left with a sense of emptiness. The ending is so abrupt that I actually thought the film was missing a real. We are left with an ending without an ending.

The Golden Compass
is New Line's biggest risk since LOTR ($180 Million) and it doesn't even come close to that kind of quality. Even with each chapter of the Lord of the Rings trilogy, we were left with an inner conclusion of the part of the story. Characters were still journeying to destroy the ring, but the moments were wrapped wonderfully for each scene of each film. In this film, we are left with a reason to see a sequel just for the sake of seeing it, one that probably won't even be made (the film only opened to $25.7 million). Only time will tell, not that anyone is really anticipating it.

Sunday, December 09, 2007

Awake

*1/2

Awake's trailer had me believing something this movie is not. It had me believing that the film was about what would happen if a patient was still mentally awake during a heart transplant and could still feel and see the pain the body goes through during the process. In fact, the film is about a young executive who may be murdered by love ones in his life. The actual anesthesia part of the film lasts for about four minutes of the film. That's not the real problem with Awake. The film just sucks.

Jessica Alba is up to her usual tricks by looking pretty and starring into the camera while Hayden Christiansen continues his wooden acting techniques. Terrence Howard is way too good of an actor to be in this film. But hey, everyone's got to heat their homes for the holidays.

The plot is absurd. Christensen plays Clay Beresford who
has a weak heart after a heart attack. He is left with his father's fortune and runs his company which from what we're told owns about half of New York. He falls in love with Sam Lockwood (Jessica Alba) who plays the pretty fiance. When he finally gets a heart to transplant, things become graphic when the anesthesia doesn't knock him out enough and he lies paralyzed and in excruciating amount of pain. But after that lasts for two seconds, he goes on an hour long journey to find a way to stop everyone from trying to kill him and take his money.

I don't want to give any more plot away because it would just give away spoilers, but the film relies on the stereotypical cliches that must take place in a suspense film. People who you thought were good are actually murderers and a last minute act of self-sacrifice saves someone important. There is no real reason to actually go and see it. Plus the film references one of the films I loathe the most (Darkness) and even though it may have worked better in this film, it certainly isn't a friendly reminder.

Thursday, December 06, 2007

Free Willy: Dedicated to Jonathon Aaron Zeichner

Don't worry, I have a reasoning behind this review.

See, I know this person by the name of Jonathon Aaron Zeichner, who for months, maybe even years now has requested that I review the film Free Willy. I always took it as a joke because that is the kind of man this person is. But I felt that I would be a hypocrite if I ignored his request because that is not the critic I want to be. So here is my Free Willy review dedicated to Mr. Zeichner. You're Welcome My Friend.

The famous scene in Free Willy (when Willy finally makes it into the free sea by jumping over Jesse and a pile of rocks)) has to be one of the most spoofed shots of the 1990's. Released in 1993, the film may not have been a critical success, but it certainly captured the heart of many kids growing up in this time. I was one of them. Now as a nineteen year old from a critical perspective, it's hard for me to review a film like this. As just a film, it's bland plot is somewhat forgettable, but as an experience growing up, it certainly earns its sentimental value.

The plot itself revolves around a young punk named Jesse, who gets caught vandalizing a marina (of course he picks a marina otherwise there would be no story here, right?) He has been on the run since his mother abandoned him six years before. As a punishment, he must work in the marina to pay of his debt, when soon becoming best friends with an oversized whale named Willy. The two form an interesting friendship that instead of being silly, it's quite delicate. The message is very simple which is a good thing. There is always someone you can turn to.

Jesse tries to get Willy ready for a competition but Willy cannot perform effectively in front of an audience so the owners plan to kill the whale for insurance money. It is up to Jesse and his friends to set the whale free. Like any Disney film, it is obvious where the film is going to end. All the bad guys will get their comeuppance while the good guys always win. The film is predictable and corny as hell, but for a kid, this is a mild cinematic treasure.

I cannot give this film a rating because it wouldn't be fair to it. I want to remember this film as it was, as a treat for my days as a young child just waiting to find more films to see, and eventually more to review.

Wednesday, November 21, 2007

I'm Not There

http://images.salon.com/ent/movies/review/2007/09/12/toronto5/story.jpgThe image “http://images.salon.com/ent/movies/review/2007/09/12/toronto5/story.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.
**** Stars

I'm Not There is an exhilarating, appropriately exhausting trip of enigmatic existence. What I didn't understand tested me and what I understood moved me. Director Todd Haynes chronicles Bob Dylan's path of life through six different actors with no direction home.

Christian Bale: Jack Rollins
Cate Blanchett: Jude Quinn
Heath Ledger: Robbie Clark
Richard Gere: Billy the Kid
Marcus Carl Franklin: Woody Guthrie
Ben Whishaw: Arthur Rimbaud

ALL ARE BOB DYLAN. All six play different aspects of one of the most influential musicians in history. From his fictional childhood (Franklin) to the stages of adulthood (Whishaw), to activating in politics (Bale), to the progression of his own sounds (Blanchett), to acting in a movie within a movie (Ledger), and to his post-motorcycle accident stage (Gere), this is a daring attempt of a biography. Unlike Ray or Walk the Line, Haynes is not focusing on a straight forward telling. Because did Dylan really lead a straight forward life? Hell no. His life was exactly how I'm Not There is displayed; full of hallucinations, heartbreak, love, songs that redefined an era, and an examination of pop culture inside one man's mind. It’s supposed to confuse you, baffle you, and give you no explanation as to why these characters are connected. Why is Dylan's child played by an African American? Maybe because he posed as someone else as a child. Maybe he thought that's who he was. Maybe the director has the balls to really make your head trip.

Blanchett is mind-blowing. Maybe she doesn't have the voice box to match Dylan's, but you forget it's Blanchett (one of the beautiful actresses in the world) the second she walks on and ignites the screen. If she hadn't already been in the Oscar spotlight for the past few years, this once again would have been her year to take home the statue. She and the collaboration of the five other actors in this film give us something we have never seen before. I'm Not There tests the mind and soul that few films this year ever could.



Tuesday, November 20, 2007

A Very Solid Thanksgiving Break




Over Thanksgiving break, I went to three films, all of which are successful in its own terms. Beowulf is the 3-D epic, Enchanted is the box-office champ, and No Country for Old Men is one of the best films of the year. Here's the breakdown of the three.



Beowulf (*** Stars)
Is it any good?: Well, even though at sometimes it looks like a cousin of the Final Fantasy series, the action is still wicked fun to watch.

Plot:
Based on the famous book by an unknown author, Beowulf's (Ray Winstone) is King Leonidas mixed in a blender with Mr. Wolf. He is a warrior who comes in to take care of business and then gets the hell out. He comes in to fight the evil demon Grendel, kills him, then sleeps with his mother. O, I forgot to add that he is a nymphomaniac. When he marries the queen, he still has sex with a young blonde. But still, when he takes over Anthony Hopkins thrown, he tries to lead his people over their enemies and pass the fact that he slept with the creator of the monster who slaughtered half their village. Good for him.

Why See It: Same groundbreaking animation as The Polar Express, only this time the action disguises the underwritten characters.

Review in a nutshell: For those who miss 300 and need a friendly reminder.


Enchanted: (*** Stars)
Is it any good?: It actually is. This is a big, pleasant surprise and proves that movie trailers can be completely hearsay.

Plot: A stereotypical princess from a 2-D animated world is thrown into present day New York. She meets McDreamy (who else would she meet) and together they realize that they may be right for eachother.

Why See It?: Amy Adams. Amy Adams. Amy Adams. Amy Adams.

Review in a Nutshell: AMY ADAMS MAKES THIS MOVIE, PURE AND SIMPLE.



No Country For Old Men: (**** Stars)

Is it any good?:
Damn right it's good. The Coen Brothers newest collaboration is an Oscar-worthy feat, one that cannot be ignored.

Plot: The plot is not the brilliance of this movie. It is a simple story of a drug deal gone wrong, with a random guy finding the money and the hitman looking for his score. It's not the outline of the film that will get you pumped up, but the moments spent with these characters. All are scared and helpless, and are doing everything they can to either protect themselves or a loved one. There are parts of this film with no dialogue for an excessive amount of time and it's more engaging than almost any other scene in films this year, including the ending. You will be shaken.

Why See It?:
Because the Coen Brothers are masterful story tellers. The scenes between
Anton Chigurh (Javier Bardem's) and Llewelyn Moss (Josh Brolin) are absolutely exhilarating, down to the very core of your bones. The tension in this movie is so direct that the chills down your spine won't stop. The entire cast is electric. Tommy Lee Jones is brilliantly funny and utterly heartbreaking as a man who loses touch with the world's fast pace and current violent culture. The title, No Country For Old Men is based around his character, Ed Tom Bell, clearly explaining that the times are not the way they were when he was young. All of the lead performances in this film are Oscar-worthy.

Review in a nutshell: To praise this film isn't enough, you have to see this masterpiece to believe it.

Sunday, November 18, 2007

Sicko

Writer/director Michael Moore explores America's health care system in The Weinstein Company's Sicko**** Stars

From general motors, to gun control, to the President of the United States, Michael Moore may be overweight, but his heart and courage is as strong as anyone. In Sicko, he tackles America's health care and how it is destroying the American dream. This film is not about those who don't have health insurance, but those who do, and still suffer when HMO's and hospital bills put families into turmoil. A mother and father have to move in with their child, several mothers lose their babies to disease and accidents, one gets charged for an ambulance bill because she didn't prepay before her car accident, 9/11 rescuers are denied treatment for their injuries on the day they saved lives, and a woman got denied a transplant because she had a yeast infection once in her life. Michael Moore then goes outside the U.S to explore other countries health care systems, which seem to be going much smoother than ours.

I can't really tell you more about the film because it has to be seen to believe. And if you see this film and don't believe that this country has a serious issue, then I have nothing to say to you. Sicko is another Oscar-Worthy selection form Michael Moore.

P.S: You may disagree with Moore's opinions, but no one can make fun of him for paying $12,000 dollars for a medical treatment for the wife of the creator of a Michael Moore hate site. That is how much he believes in this cause.


Lions for Lambs


**** Stars

Robert Redford, Meryl Streep, and Tom Cruise pull out all the stops and tackle several important issues in a world full of confusion, concern, and consternation. Through a series of sharp and complex debates, Lions for Lambs uniquely captures exactly what America is discussing...Who are we as a nation? I'll never understand why critics are being so harsh on this film. This is a refreshing, original approach towards a country in a very vulnerable state.

I love this new film genre that's being created. Like Crash and Babel, Lions for Lambs has several storylines connecting to one another, where a characters decision effects someone else in the story they've never met. Professor Stephen Malley (Robert Redford) works at the University of California and is lecturing a brilliant student on the importance of using his knowledge towards something good, rather than wasting time complaining about the country's problems and partying with his fraternity. He tells the young man about two students he had (Derek Luke and Michael Pena) who volunteered for military involvement in the War on Iraq. While in Iraq, the two soldiers are affected by a political move made by Senator Jasper Irving (Tom Cruise). He gives his story to journalist Janine Roth (Meryl Streep) who tries to understand Irving's decision.

The Tom Cruise and Meryl Streep debate in particular is hard to take your eyes off of. The Senator has no dark secrets, no ghosts in his closet, but only a man who is doing what he believes to win the war on terror. The journalist has different views and only wants to know the intentions of him and whether or not he is making the right choices for the country. The last scenes in this film are truly riveting.

Whether you are an elephant of donkey, you can't deny that Lions for Lambs message has the right intentions. What can one American do to change the country? The film is not asking for everyone to become a G.I Joe or Mother Teresa, but only to do the right thing involving an important decision in your life.




Wednesday, October 31, 2007

American Gangster

***1/2 Stars


"My man..."

Denzel Washington is nothin' but cool as he grins and says these words to anybody who impresses him, cops or dealers. American Gangster is brilliantly acted, wonderfully told, and definitely the work of a master.

The film had a lot of trouble getting to the big screen. Antoine Fuqua, (director of Training Day) was originally set to direct with Washington to star. The film was cancelled due to budget concerns, Fuqua was fired, and Denzel took a 20$ million paycheck. Soon after, it turned up into the hands of director Ridley Scott and producer Brian Grazer, with Denzel back in the lead and another 20$ million. Russell Crowe joined the cast and the dynamic foursome would eventually turn in a dynamite of a crime-thriller.

This is the true story of drug-lord Frank Lucas and how New Jersey honest cop Richie Richards (Crowe) took him down. The very first shot of the movie is Lucas doing his job. He tortures a man, covers him in gasoline, lights him on fire and puts numerous bullets into his head. We don't know who this man is or what he did, but now we know Lucas is a man you don't mess with...period.

After Lucas finally gets settled into the mob boss persona, things shift towards Roberts. His wife leaves him with their only son, his partner dies, and he has sex with a lot of women. Good for him. Him and his wife go to court for custody of their child, but of course Roberts has to have a sudden epiphany that he's a bad father when his ex-wife tells him he belongs in hell. Again, good for him. So all in all, Roberts is an extremely honest cop, but yet can't be honest with the people he loves.

The movie is so authentic to its time that the film looks like it was made in the same time it takes place, right smack in the middle of the Vietnam War. Scott swiftly connects the war to Lucas. In the beginning, Lucas is in control and calm. When the war goes crazy, so does Lucas. When the cease fire occurs, Lucas begins to lose his drug connections from military officials stationed in Bangkok. Washington captures his character perfectly, giving a restrained performance to begin the film, then showing his emotional downfall without being pretentious.

The movie is all drugs. DRUGS, DRUGS, DRUGS. It doesn't lose its historical accuracy for cheap thrills, especially the ending. Though un-climatic, it has a much bigger impact when you see Lucas's aged face coming out of a fifteen year sentence.

By the way, I just have to add that Cuba Gooding Jr. is in about three scenes of the film, and it's better than any performance he's had in ten years. (So, Jerry Maguire)

Friday, October 26, 2007

Saw IV


0 Stars

I have lied to my readers. I told all of you that I usually only walk out on one movie a year and this year's winner was Rush Hour 3. Saw IV joins this category as a truly disgusting site where no one wants to be apart of, except for the people shopping at a torture porn shop or online at www.lacerationfetishes.com

Dan in Real Life

http://graphics.boston.com/resize/bonzai-fba/Globe_Photo/2007/10/25/1193358928_3975/410w.jpg

**1/2 Stars

Steve Carell has really come into his own these past few years, with his over-the-top supporting performances (Anchorman & Bruce Almighty), his successful lead role in NBC's The Office, and his more subdued work in the Oscar Winner Little Miss Sunshine. Dan in Real Life joins Sunshine as one of Carell's most personal and realistic performances. Too bad the film falls shy of greatness due to a lackluster and unfortunately clichéd ending. Also, notice how I didn't include Evan Almighty? In my mind, that film no longer exists.

Dan in Real Life is supposed to be wise about human nature. And it succeeds to a point, and that point comes at a crucial climatic moment that fails to give us real truth. It goes for the heart, but skips important reasoning in the process.

Dan Burns (Carell) is a widowed father, devoted to his three daughters who mistake him for being an over protected basket case. However, to his family and friends, he certainly becomes one after he meets Marie (Juliette Binoche) in a bookstore. She is the first woman Dan has fallen for since the death of his wife. He runs home to tell his entire family, only to find out that she is dating his brother Mitch (Dane Cook). What starts of as an extremely failed idea for a sitcom manages to swoon smoothly above the level of disaster. However, the only problem with this idea is that somewhere down the line, a sitcom idea must have a sitcom ending.

Now, I did enjoy the film's theme of family values. The entire film is mostly set in a family household involving issues we the viewers can all relate to: A widowed father, a daughter in love, learning how to drive, family traditions and games, and in this case a crucial time for the maturity of Dan's children. Dan's change of heart over the course of the film challenges the regrets of his past and decisions of his future. What takes away from these moments is an ending way too comfortable for us to believe. The title should be Dan in Hollywood Life.




Tuesday, October 23, 2007

From the Archives: A Beautiful Mind


**** Stars

A Beautiful Mind, which won four Oscars in 2001 (including Best Picture) is definitely an Oscar worthy film, even though The Fellowship of Ring should have been claimed the winner. With two movies out this fall, 3:10 to Yuma and American Gangster, Russell Crowe has had a credit history of amazing roles, A Beautiful Mind being one of his most memorable. Here, he plays, John Nash, who was a brilliant mathematician, able to unlock any code and solve any problem known in mathematics. Suddenly, in the middle stages of his life, he began to suffer from schizophrenia. His delusions affected his life, his work, and his family. His wife Alicia and his son John Nash Jr. tried to help him deal with this awful disease.

After years of difficulty and hardship, Nash was able to control his disease and receive the Nobel piece prize. His research helped in global trade, the economy, and even breakthroughs in evolutionary biology. He began to live his American Dream. His dream was his work and his wife.

Other cast members include Ed Harris, Jennifer Connelly (who won best supporting actress in the role of John's wife), and Paul Bettany.

Ron Howard directs this complex subject with sincere simplicity. Through all the hard ache suffered, the film ends on a wonderful note. The words John says to his wife....

“I've made the most important discovery of my career. Most important discovery of my life. It's only in the mysterious equation of love that any logical reasons can be found. I'm only here because of you. You're the only reason I am. You are all my reasons...”